¸ê®Æ·J¾ã   /  ²z½×®a  /  Jean  Baudrillard  ©|¡D¥¬§Æ¨È  /  °Ñ¦Ò¸ê®Æ  /  Ä³ÃD°Q½× Issues
Jean  Baudrillard
©|¡D¥¬§Æ¨È
¹Ï¤ù¨Ó·½¡Ghttp://www.uta.edu/english/cgb/Baud2/front3.html
¸ê®Æ´£¨ÑªÌ¡GBrian Chen;Kate Liu/¼B¬ö¶²;Wanli Liu;Diane Kao/°ª¹©³ü;Wen-ling Su/Ĭ¤å§D

Image: Project Baudrillard  (remote: http://www.uta.edu/english/cgb/Baud2/front3.html)
 

Jean Baudrillard

Providers: Brian Chen; Kate Liu / ¼B ¬ö¶²;Wanli Liu

General Ideas  & 
Questions
Simulacra & Simulation
Quotes & Examples
An Outline (Brian Chen)
Ecstasy of Communication: An Outline (Wanli Liu)

General Ideas  & Questions
I. Different Phases of his Work
  1. "Starting with a re-evaluation and critique of Marx's economic theory of the object, especially as concerns the notion of 'use-value', JB develops the first major phase of his work with a semiotically based theory of production and the obejct, one that emphasises the 'sign-value' of objects.
  2. . . .from his writings of the mid-1970s onwards, starting with Symbolic Exchange and Death, B has taken uup the radical consequences, as he sees them, of the pervasiveness of the code in late-modern societies.  The code certainly refers to computerisation, and to digitalisation, but it is also fundamental in physics, biology and other natural sciences where it enables a perfect reproduction of the object or situation; for this reason the code enables a by-passing of the real and opens up what B has famously designated as 'hyperreality'.  (Lechte, 233)
II. Central Ideas: Code and Reproduction
  1. code: e.g. the binary code of computer technology; the DNA code in biology, or the digital code in television and sound recording -- the code in information technology.
  2. "Central to Baudrillard's concerns is the connection between code and reproduction -- reproduction which is itself 'original'.  The code entials that the object produced -- tissue in biology, for example -- is not a copy in the accepted sense of the term, where the copy is the copy of an original, natural object.  (Lechte, 235)
     
  3. Use Value, Exchange Value and Sign Value:  (The following note explains why production is consumption, and vice versa, for Baudrillard.)
[The usefulness of a thing makes it a use-value. ... Exchange- value appears first of all as the quantitative relatin, the proportion, in which use-values of one kind exchange for use-values of another kind. ...
the exchange relation of comodities is characterised precisely by its abstraction from their use-values" (Marx Capital 126-27).
  • Consumption in the traditional economic sense: "the conversion of exchange value into use value."
  • Consumption in the redefinition of the political economy of the sign:" includes the act of spending as production of sign value . .. "
  • "Precisely speaking, there is no symbolic "value," there is only symbolic "exchange," which defines itself precisely as something distinct from, and beyond value and code.  All forms of value (object, commodity or sign) must be negated in order to inaugurate symbolic exchange.  (Jean Baudrillard Selected Writings 58-59)
 


VI. Questions:

  • Simulations: Are of the examples Baudrillard gives the same kind of simulacra?
  • Do you think it is good to be hyperreal?  Or, do you find any crisis in the world of simulations?
  • Implosion: Do you see in our society that opposites begin to collapse (between the good and the evil, the active and the passive, cause and effect, ends and means, etc.) and 'everything becomes undecidable'?  If Reagon, for Baurillard, does not have real power, how about our president?  How does our government simulate power?

    General

  • Is Baudrillard really against science?
  • Is there no more truthin postmodern world?  Where is "the desert of the real?"  Do we really have what B calls "a panic-stricken production of the real and the referential"

Simulacra and Simulation
 
The simulacrum is never what hides the truth--  
it is truth that hides the fact that there is none.  
The simulacrum is true.  
--Ecclesiastes  
  
Such would be the successive phases of the image:  

     it is the reflection of a profound reality;  
     it masks and denatures a profound reality;  
     it masks the *absence* of a profound reality;  
     it has no relation to any reality whatsoever: it is its own pure simulacrum. 

In the first case, the image is a good appearance--representation is of the sacramental  
order. In the second, it is an evil appearance--it is of the order of maleficence. In the  
third, it plays at being an appearance--it is of the order of sorcery. In the fourth, it is no  
longer of the order of appearances, but of simulation.  

Baudrillard, "The Precession of Simulacra,"  Simulacra and Simulation , p. 6.  

Implosion: ". . .nothing separates one pole from the other, the initial from the terminal: there is just a sort of contraction into each other, a fantastic telescoping, a collapsing of the two traditional poles into one another: an IMPLOSION --an absorption of the radiating model of causality, of the differential mode of determination, with its positive and negative electricity -- an implosion of meaning.  This is where simulation begins."

The Examples of Simulation:
A. the biological and scientific -- 1. simulation of symptoms; 10. DNA model reproduction; 11. Nuclear deterrence
B. the religious -- 2. the simulacrum of divinity;
C. museumification of culture -- 3. the return of the Tasaday; 4. the salvage of Rameses' mummy, 5. return of part of a Cloister to its origin,
D. popular culture -- 6. Disney; 9. the filming of the Louds
E. the political -- 7. Watergate; 12. Vietnam war, Algerian war
F. social crimes -- 8. all holdups, hijacks,

¡@

Lechte, John.  Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers.  New York: Routledge, 1994.

Copyright ©2009 °ê¬ì·|¤H¤å¾Ç¤¤¤ß All Rights Reserved.