Piers 
  Plowman 
Provider: 
  Cecilia Liu / 
  ¼B³·¬Ã 
Gender and Personification 
  - Gender and personification 
    -- Female forms/bodies 
 In the Dreamer's encounter with Lady Holy Church we trace certain tensions 
    in the masculine perception of an idealized body of the Church in female form; 
    in the story of the marital fortunes of the more mobile figure of Meed 
    of the Maid we see how the reward-dynamic of contemporary society is apprehended 
    by the Dreamer.  Meed seems to embody at various stages both the dynamic 
    of a reward-based society and its most common currency: material gifts and 
    money. That she embodies an antithetical social order to that of Lady Holy 
    Church and/or represents a lower social class are interpretations which depend 
    on whose 'version' of Meed is being represented at any particular time in 
    the Dreamer's vision.  Her changing form (e.g. from illegitimate rich 
    maid to legitimate 'muliere' to common whore) is an index of the contested 
    definition of her proper name. In the story of the changing marital prospects 
    of this very much man-made object of desire, no less than in the story of 
    Lady Holy Church, we can see something of the operations of the traffic in 
    reward in the Dreamer's society and something, too, of his society's 'traffic 
    in women.' (Men have certain rights in their female kin, and women do not 
    have the same rights either to themselves or to their male kin.)
- By the fourteenth century, the 
    iconography of the female form, the realization of the figure of the Church 
    as the Bride of Christ and as Mother Church had considerable currency in the 
    imagistic repertoire of Western Christianity.
- It is significant that the Dreamer 
    does not initially recognize the Lady in personal terms. The authority of 
    the Lady is signaled by her social orientation as an inhabitant of the fixed 
    and stable castle, and it is with an overwhelming sense of her "otherness" 
    (in class and gender terms) that the Dreamer begins his dialogue.  Already 
    we may observe a discrepancy between the perception the Dreamer has of Lady 
    Holy Church in an idealized female form excluded, it seems, from his everyday 
    life and the Lady's view of herself, which insists on her spiritual reality 
    and her social immanence. 
- Lady Holy Church emphasizes that 
    the Dreamer's vision is socially determined yet fictional; as is her representation 
    within it.  The 'real' Church is not female, nor perfected, any more 
    than 'real' Christians are likely to find their salvation by merely dreaming. 
- Both Lady Holy Church and Meed 
    represent projections of male desire, although the desire for Meed seems to 
    be more immediately recognizable by the Dreamer. When he sees Meed, he too 
    is ravished by her appearance (Passus II, 8-16).  In the arrangement 
    of women, on the right and the left, Lady Holy Church and Meed the Maid, it 
    seems as though the Dreamer is drawing on a cultural cliché, a version 
    of the Mary/Eve opposition, to express and explore other kinds of antithetical 
    values, spiritual and secular. One kind of polarized binary opposition in 
    circulation in his culture (the splitting of womankind into two opposed figures) 
    provides him with a way into exploring other kinds of oppositions: the dichotomy 
    between the operations of the heavenly economy of redemption and an earthly 
    economy involving material reward appears to be aligned to the split between 
    Lady Holy Church's world of guaranteed truth (alienating and mystifying though 
    its language has proved to the Dreamer) and the context in which her rival 
    Meed is ensconced.
- The Dreamer, in his visions, does 
    not have access to a pure symbolic order: his visions, his conceptualizing 
    abilities, are socially based and culture bound. The female forms he imagines 
    are figured as social beings, with particular class-based interests (which 
    in the case of Lady Holy Church and Meed the Maid appear to be in competition), 
    not actually as females in the abstract (something which is virtually impossible 
    to figure in isolation anyway). The language of femininity, of feudalism, 
    of mercantilism (to name just three of the discourses in combination here) 
    are in dialogue in the figures of Lady Holy Church and Meed the Maid, just 
    as these figures are engaged in dialogues with the male figures who are around 
    them, whose own access to social, material, spiritual capital is a variable 
    (and in these stakes the Dreamer seems a poor man all round).
(external)  English 
  Literature I: the Medieval Period;English 
  Literature and Culture 
  From Medieval Period to the Eighteenth Century
 
  English 
  Literature I: the Medieval Period;English 
  Literature and Culture 
  From Medieval Period to the Eighteenth Century