Part V:
Maternity, Feminism, and Female Sexuality |
|||||||
Charity Liu |
|||||||
Desire in Language | |||||||
"Motherhood According to Giovanni Bellini" -- Published in 1975 when Kristeva was pregnant with her son who was born in 1976 -- A theory of maternity with which she goes on to analyze some of Bellini's paintings of the Madonna and Child |
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Gestation, becoming-a-mother, can possibly be accounted for by two discourses: (1) Science: Completely negle course, not concerned with the subject. -- Maternal as natural and therefore presocial, biological process -- Mother as site of her proceedings -- Science cannot account for the splitting of subjectivity in the maternal body ¡÷ If we confer identity on the process then we are "positing an animism that reflects the inherent psychosis of the speaking Being." Yet at the same time, we cannot take solace in the fantasy of the "Phallic Mother," presuming that the mother is "mastering" the process, for if we do, " it is prior to the social-symbolic-linguistic contract of the group, (and) we acknowledge the risk of losing identity at the same time as we ward it off". (2) Christian theology (canonical theology) -- Defines maternity as an "impossible elsewhere, a sacred beyond", establishing "a sort of subject at the point where the subject and its speech split apart, fragment and vanish." -- Address the move from nature to culture in the maternal body with the image of Virgin Mary, but the maternal body is reduced to silence ¡÷ Apart from these extreme poles of science and spirituality, at some point the mother is acknowledged to be the master of the process of gestation if only in order to guarantee symbolic coherence.(304) ¡÷ Thus a 'phallic' mother is assumed, in order for every speaker not to conceive their being in relation to a void, a nothingness.(304) But to maintain the social symbolic linguistic contract of the group, this acknowledgement of subjecthood of the mother is at the same time denied. The result leaves the maternal body as "the place of a splitting which remains a constant factor in social reality." |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- Through the body, destined to insure reproduction of species, the woman-subject like a filter, where nature confronts culture | |||||||
The fantasy of Phallic Mother: |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- The psychoanalytic discourse of analysis assumes the desire for motherhood to be anchored within the paternal symbolic order regarding it either as a transformation of penis envy or anal drive. | |||||||
"a desire to bear a child of the father (a child of her own father); the father here is assimilated to the baby itself and thus returned to its place as devalorized man, summoned only to accomplish his function" (that's is, to originate and justify reproductive desire) | |||||||
¡÷ But, Kristeva proceeds, "motherhood seems to be impelled also by a nonsymbolic, nonpaternal causality.(305) |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- Primal regression can be phantasmatically experienced as the reunion of a woman-mother with the body of her mother |
|||||||
A. The symbolic paternal facet | |||||||
-- Having feminine aphasia within the desire to bear the father's child |
|||||||
B. The homosexual-maternal facet | |||||||
-- Whirl of words, a complete absence of meaning and seeing; it is feeling, displacement, rhythm, sound, flashes, and fantasied clinging to the maternal body. | |||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- Mother is within an enceinte separating her from the world of everyone else |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- Woman also attains it by split symbolization (threshold of instinctual drive, of the "symbolic" and the "semiotic") of which the act of giving birth consists |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- This instilling the subjectless of the symbolic biological program into the very body of a symbolizing subject |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- Follows maternal jouissance arising, the sublimation taking place at the very moment of primal repression within the mother's body, | |||||||
*Through aesthetic activity the individual structures a sense of self and world in order to overcome melancholia and restore a degree of happiness, value and purpose. Kristeva refers to this process as sublimation, | |||||||
*Sublimation is a matter of finding the language that connects with the non-symbolized trauma of mother loss and its affects and brings them to articulation in the interpersonal realm." | |||||||
-- Artists speak from a place where she is not, where she knows not. |
|||||||
Translibidinal jouissance: |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- Leonardo Da Vinci and Giovanni Bellini (1) body as fetish (2) predominance of differences beyond and despite corporeal representation |
|||||||
*On one hand, Da Vinci's Madonnas, evidence the overprotective mother's role increasing Leonardo's narcissism; on the other hand, the hostile mother type is observed in some of the Bellini's Madonnas, in which feelings of distance-anguish between mother and son are depicted. | |||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Tales of Love |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- unlike Freud and Lacan¡Xattribute language acquisition and socialization to the paternal function and ignore the function of the mother as anything other than the primary object or partial object | |||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- A regulation and structure in the maternal body and the child's relationship to that body |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- We need an image of maternity that can find the social relationship. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- The only way available for women to reestablish their identities with the maternal body is through becoming mothers themselves. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
-- Distinction between these two necessary functions is breaking down. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
New Maladies of the Soul |
|||||||
"Women's Time"¡Xa mixed response from feminists in US. |
|||||||
-- First (prior to 1968) feminism is the feminism of suffragettes and existentialists. It is struggle over the identity of woman as rational citizen, deserving of the "right of man." The ideal "woman" contains the same characteristics of the ideal "man" and struggle to inset her in man's linear history. | |||||||
-- Second (after 1968) feminism is the feminism of psychoanalysts and artists. It is a struggle against reducing the identity of woman to the identity of man by inserting her into his linear time. Assert a unique essence of woman or the feminine which falls outside of phallic time and phallic discourse. | |||||||
¡÷ She rejects them both and identifies herself with a third generation of feminists who challenge notions of seamless identity in general, and notions of man and woman in particular. |
|||||||
Interview with Elian Hoffman Baruch -- She discusses the notion of abjection developed in Power of Horror . The abjection of the maternal body applies only to the experience of the male infant. The female infant has a different relationship to the maternal body. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Black Sun |
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Hannah Arendt: Volume one of Female Genius: Life, madness Words |
|||||||
-- The genius is an antidote to massification -- Genius represents originality -- Genius becomes what she is through an interaction with her environment and with others |
|||||||
"The singularity of every woman" -- The genius of everyday life is women's genius, particularly a mother's genius. -- In creating new human beings, mothers are each singularity innovators, reinventing the child anew every time. -- Mother may represents the "only safeguard against the wholesale automation of human beings" -- Each mother, and each mother-child relationship, is unique. |
|||||||
Reference |
|||||||
Stanton, Domna C. "Difference on Trial: A Critique of the Maternal Metaphor in Cixous, Irigaray, and Kristeva." in The Poetics of Gender. Ed. Nancy K. Miller. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 157-181. | |||||||