Greimas:
Major Concepts
Provider: Kate Liu
/ ¼B¬ö¶²
I.
"semiotic reduction" aims at rewriting a verbal or linguistic text
into more fundamental mechanisms of meaning
binary opposition as the
basic human conceptual mode--
"Narrative is thereby triumphantly demonstrated to be a form of thinking,
but at a heavy price, namely, its rewriting, reduction, or transformation
back into abstract thinking and its tokens or counters" (J xi)
[top]
II. semiotic square
The main object
of the theory of the semiotic square is to articulate the substance
of the content and therein constitute the form of the content. --
This elementary structure should be considered "on the one hand, as
a concept uniting the minimal condition for the apprehension and/or
the production of signification, and on the other hand, as a
model containing the minimal definition of any language...and of any
semiotic unit"
stability of meaning
production--"When such reduction has been achieved, ...all we have are
other words and other meanings, another text, a set of terms ...of texts
and linguistic and conceptual operations if anything even more complex
than the original verbal object to be thereby "reduced".
--it constitutes
a virtual map of conceptual closure, or ...of the closure of ideology
itself...as a mechanism
it can "reduce" a narrative
in movement to a series of "cognitive" or ideological, combinatory
positions; or it can rewrite a cognitive text into a desperate narrative
movement in which new positions are generated and abandoned.
[top]
III.
the object of semiotics, the process of transformation--of the production
of meaning
meaning: always-already-given
in the process of transformation into another meaning
"The production of meaning
is meaningful only if it is the transformation of a meaning already
given; the production of meaning is consequently a signifying
endowment with form indifferent to whatever content it may be called
on to transform."
[top]
IV.
Conversion
"the generation
of meaning does not first take the form of the production of utterances
and their combination in discourse; it is relayed, in the course of
its trajectory, by narrative structure and it is these that produce
meaningful discourse articulated in utterances.
"A theoretical construct,
no matter how satisfying it appears at first view, runs the risk of
remaining hypothetical as long as the problem of equivalences
between different levels of depth is not clearly posed, as long as
the procedures of conversion from one level to another have
not been elaborated" (xxxii)
--there exist syntagmatic
supplements at the surface level that cannot be obtained from the
conversion of the fundamental grammar to the surface grammar
[top]
V. Semiotics:
Greimas defines
semiotics as "a hierarchy that can be subjected to analysis and the
elements of which can be determined by reciprocal relations (and by
communication)" (22)...a semiotics exits only as a possibility of
description and the system of relations described does not
depend on the nature of the signs by which the external or internal
world is manifested.
--...such theories attempt
to account for the articulation and of manifestation of the semantic
universe as a totality of meaning belonging to the cultural or
personal order. (64)
--reserves a place at its
center for a fundamental semantics and grammar
[top]
VI.
Greimas & Propp
--(While Propp focused
on a single genre,) Greimas aims to arrive at the universal 'grammar'
of narrative by applying to it a semantic analysis of sentence structure
--Propp's seven 'sphere
of action'--three pairs of binary oppositions including six roles
(actants)--Subject/Object, Sender/ Receiver, Helper/Opponent--three
basic patterns: 1. Desire, search, or aim, 2. communication 3.
Auxiliary support or hindrance.
--P's 31 functions--G 20
grouped into 3 structures (symtagms): contractual, performative, disjunctive
--like Propp, G argues
for a 'grammar' of narrative, ...But unlike P, he sees the story as
a semantic structure analogous to the sentence and yielding
itself to an appropriate kind of analysis.
--G more truly 'structuralist'
than the Russian Formalist Propp, in that the former thinks in terms
of relations between entities rather than of the character
of entities themselves.
[top]
(external) Literary
Criticism Databank: Structuralism and Semiotics
|