The Seventeenth Century
American Literature--
The Puritans

Provider: Dr. Margarette Connor & Dr. Ron Tranquilla

Concept & Background in the ColonialPeriod of American Literature
Major Texts
1. John Calvin's
Five Points
2. The Puritans / Early American Women Writers: Voices in the Wilderness
3.Thomas Shepard: Preface to
Peter Bulkeley's Sermons (1651)

4. John Winthrop
5. Anne Bradstreet
6.
Samuel Sewall
7.
Charles Downey,
Los Angeles Times Syndicate
8. Some Puritan Images

Concept 1: Discover America The Puritans
Concept 2: Early Houses and Portraits


John Calvin's Five Points

Calvin (1509-1564) was a Protestant reformer in Geneva, Switzerland whose theological beliefs he summarized in "five points" which became the basis of the Presbyterian church and formed the basic theological tenets of Puritan theology. Calvin's points, based on a literal interpretation of the first chapters of Genesis, are:

Total Depravity--Human beings are totally evil, born sinners because of Adam and Eve's sin of disobeying God in the Garden of Eden; God is all, hmans nothing and the source of all evil in the world.

Unconditional Election--Although not obligated to do so, God has chosen to save ("elect") certain people, with NO reference to their lives or works; in fact, he knows beforehand who will be elect (predestination).

Limited Atonement--Christ did not die for all, but only for the Elect.

Irresistible Grace--God's grace is freely given by Him (to the Elect) and can neither be earned nor refused. Grace is God's saving power to redeem and save us through the forgiveness of sins, newness of life, the power to resist temptation, and peace of mind and heart.

Perserverance of the Saints--God gives the Elect the full power to do God's will and live uprightly to the end of their lives.

[TOP]

The Puritans
The "Pilgrims," so named in the ninete enth century, were Dissenters from the Puritans, who wanted to reform the Anglican Church not separate from it as the Dissenters did (thus their other name, Separatists). The Puritans were a group of Anglicans who wanted to reform the Anglican Church theologically, not just politically as Henry VIII had done in declaring himself head of the church. The Separatists were followers of Robert Brown (thus their other name, the Brownists) who taught the following, beginning in about 1580: "The true church is a local body of genuine believers in Jesus Christ, united to him and to each other by a voluntary covenant. Such a church is self-governing, with Chirst as its real head. It chooses its own pastor and other officers as prescribed by the New Testament, but in r eality every member is responsible for every other. No church has authority over any other, and thus there is no ecclesiastical hierarchy. . . . On the other hand, . . .Puritans were alarmed at this radicalism, which to them seemed little more than spiritual and political anarchy. They resented also the implication that true understanding of the Bible could be attained simply and directly by Divine revelation, thus placing the unlettered lower classes on a par with their educated superiors. . . ."

--from Rod Horton and Herbert Edwards, Backgrounds of American Literature.

Both Puritans and Dissenters believed in a "God of History," like the God of the Israelites, who would intervene actively and constantly in their lives.

Both, therefore, believed in a "Covenant Theology," believing that each individual and each congregation must enter into a two-way covenant with God , based on the Old Testament theme of covenant (c.f. Exodus' Ark of the Covenant), as a way to explain the Calvinist doctrines of Election and Perserverance of the Saints and God's relationship with His creation. Both Puritans and Dissenters were "Calvinist." The doctrine of Limited Atonement, that Christ did not die for all humanity but only for the Elect, and that God has "elected" to save these few, which election is foreknown (because God is all-knowing) and foreordained and therefore not based on one's life or "goodness" (because, since Adam and Eve's Fall, no humans are Good), is based on Calvin's interpretation of many Biblical passages, for example, this one from the book of Romans, 8:29-30: "29. For those whom he [God] foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be first-born among many brethren. 30. And those whom he predestined he also called; and those whom he called h e also justified; and those whom he justified he also glorified." (Notice how verse 29 relates to Calvin's doctrines of Unconditional Election and Limited Atonement, and how verse 30 relates to Calvin's doctrines of Irresistible Grace and Perserverance o f the Saints.)
[TOP]


Early American Women Writers: Voices in the Wilderness
Puritan writers.
Who were the Puritans?
Word has got negative connotations now, but religious radical views aside, they were pretty interesting people.
The first Puritan colonists who settled New England exemplified the seriousness of Reformation Christianity. Known as the "Pilgrims," they were a small group of believers who had migrated from England to Holland -- even then known for its religious tolerance -- in 1608, during a time of persecutions.
Like most Puritans, they interpreted the Bible literally. They read and acted on the text of the Second Book of Corinthians -- "Come out from among them and be ye separate, saith the Lord." Despairing of purifying the Church of England from within, "Separatists" formed underground "covenanted" churches that swore loyalty to the group instead of the king. Seen as traitors to the king as well as heretics damned to hell, they were often persecuted. Their separation took them ultimately to the New World.
According to Kathryn VanSpanckeren, a specialist in American literature, "It is likely that no other colonists in the history of the world were as intellectual as the Puritans."

  • Between 1630 and 1690, there were as many university graduates in the northeastern section of the United States, known as New England, as in the mother country
  • They wanted education to understand and execute God's will as they established their colonies throughout New England.
    Life was seen as a test; failure led to eternal damnation and hellfire, and success to heavenly bliss. This world was an arena of constant battle between the forces of God and the forces of Satan, a formidable enemy with many disguises.
    Scholars have long pointed out the link between Puritanism and capitalism: Both rest on ambition, hard work, and an intense striving for success. Although individual Puritans could not know, in strict theological terms, whether they were "saved" and among the elect who would go to heaven, Puritans tended to feel that earthly success was a sign of election. Wealth and status were sought not only for themselves, but as welcome reassurances of spiritual health and promises of eternal life.

    The manifestation of this belief is one of the first big differences in American writing.

    Moreover, the concept of stewardship encouraged success. The Puritans interpreted all things and events as symbols with deeper spiritual meanings, and felt that in advancing their own profit and their community's well-being, they were also furthering God's plans. They did not draw lines of distinction between the secular and religious spheres: All of life was an expression of the divine will -- a belief that later resurfaces in Transcendentalism and authors like Margaret Fuller and Louisa May Alcott

    See more in
    Anne Bradstreet, Mary Rowlandson, Sarah Kemble Knight

    From a lecture given by Margarette Connor, 21 September 2000 at the American Library of Geneva

    [TOP]


     

    Thomas Shepard: Preface to Peter Bulkeley's Sermons (1651)

    The blessed God hath evermore delighted to reveal and communicate himself by way of Covenant. He might have done good to man before his fall, as also since his fall, without binding himself in the bond of Covenant; Noah, Abraham, and David, Jews, Ge ntiles, might have had the blessings intended, without any promise of Covenant. But the Lord's heart is so full of love (especially to His own) that it cannot be contained so long within the bounds of secrecy--viz. from God's eternal purpose to the actual accomplishment of good things intended--but it must aforehand overflow and break out into the many streams of a blessed Covenant. The Lord can never get near enough to His people, and thinks He can never get them near enough unto Himself, and therefore unites and binds and fastens them close to Himself, and Himself unto them, by the bonds of a Covenant. And therefore when we b reak our Covenant, and it will not hols us, He takes a faster bond and makes a sure and everlasting Covenant, according to Grace, not according to Works [that is, salvation depends on God's election of us, not our good deeds]; and that shall hold His peop le firm unto Himself, and hold Himself close and fast unto them, that He may never depart from us.

    Oh! the depth of God's grace herein: that when sinful man deservres never to have the least good word from Him, that He should open His whole heart and p urpose to him in a Covenant; that when he deserves nothing else but separation from God, and to be driven up and down the world as a vagabond, or as dried leaves fallen from our God, that yet the Almighty God cannot be content with it, but must make Himself to us, and us to Himself, more sure and near than ever before! And is not this Covenant then (Christian reader) worth thy looking into and searching after? Surely never was there a time wherein the Lord calles to His people to more serious searching into the nature of the Covenant than in these days. . . .

    [TOP]

    John Winthrop

    Journal

    [October 21, 1636] One Mrs Hutchinson [Anne Hutchinson, 1591-1643, a dissenter in the Massachusetts Bay Colony], a member of the church of Boston, a woman of ready wit and bold spirit, brought over with her two dangerous errors: 1. That the person o f the Holy Spirit dwells in [in fact, is in personal unity with] a justified person [one of God\rquote s Elect]. 2. That no sanctification can help to evidence to us our justification. . . .

    [October 25, 1636] The other ministers in the bay, hearing of these things, came to Boston at the time of the general court, and entered in private with them, to the end they might know the certainty of these things; that if need were, they might wr ite the church in Boston about them, to prevent (if it were possible) the dangers, which seemed hereby to hang over that and the rest of the churches. . . .

    [November 1, 1637] The court . . . sent for Mrs. Hutchinson and charged her with divers matters, as her keeping two public lectures every week in her house. . . and for reproaching most of the ministers. . . for not preaching a covenant of free grace. . . . [She claimed to the court that God had revealed to her that she would come into New England and be persecuted, and God would ruin the Puritans there for that reason]. So the court proceeded and banished her. . . .

    [March 22, 1638] . . .After she was excommunicated, her spirits, which seemed before to be somewhat dejected, revived again, and she glorified in her sufferings, saying, that it was the greatest happiness next to Christ, that ever befell her. . . .

    [Roger Williams, another significant banished and excommunicated dissenter, helped Hutchinson settle near Providence, R.I., Williams' colony, outside Massachusetts Bay Colony.]

    [TOP]


    Anne Bradstreet

    "In Memory of my Dear Grandchild Anne Bradstreet Who Deceased June 20, 1669, Being Three Years and Seven Months Old"

    [Three of Bradstreet's grandchildren died as infants, Anne being the second]

    With troubled heart and trembling hand I write,

    The heavens have changed my sorrow to delight.

    How oft with disappointment have I met,

    When on fading things my hopes have set.

    Experience might 'fore this have made me wise,

    To value things according to their price.

    Was ever stable joy yet found below?

    Or perfect bliss without a mixture of woe?

    I knew she was but as a withering flower,

    That's here today, perhaps gone in an hour;

    Like as a bubble, or the brittle glass,

    Or like a shadow turning as it was.

    More fool then I to look on what was lent

    As if mine own, when thus impermanent.

    Farewell dear child, thou ne'er shall come to me,

    But yet a while, and I shall go to thee;

    Mean time my throbbing heart's cheered up with this:

    Thou with my Savior art in endless bliss

    [TOP]


    Samuel Sewall

    Diary

    Monday, April 29, 1695. The morning is very warm and Sunshiny; in the Afternoon there is Thunder and Lightening, and about 2 p.m. a very extraordinary Storm of Hail, so that the ground was made white with it, as with the blossoms when fallen; 'twas as big as pistoll and Musquet Bullets; It broke of the Glass of the new House about 480 Quarells [squares] of the Front; of Mr. Sergeant's about as much. . . . Many Hail-Stones broke throw the Glass and flew to the middle of the Room, or farther: People afterward Gazed upon the House to see its Ruins. I got Mr. Mather [the Reverend Cotton Mather, Sewall's pastor, who was visiting for dinner at the time] to pray with us after this awfull Providence; He told God He had broken the brittle part of our house, and prayd that we might be ready for the time when our Clay-Tabernacles [our bodies] should be broken. . . .

    [TOP]


    "The First Thanksgiving"

    --by Charles Downey, Los Angeles Times Syndicate

    [The first Thanksgiving was not held in November, and the meal probably included no Turkey. If you wanted to recreate the first Thanksgiving. . .] . . . To be true to the occasion, you would hold the feast in late September or early October. Then, you would eat and make merry for at least three days. . . . You would not call the holiday Thanksgiving but a "harvest home" festival. To really drive home the point, call yourself a "Saint," not a Puritan, dress up in some colorful clothes, put on a feathered cap. . . . Then, dig into a second helping of eel. . . .

    The harvest home festival started in the Middle Ages and was held when a good crop was brought in. . . . Whenever it was held, the occasion was marked by food and merry-making. To the first English settlers to America, the word "thanksgiving" did not denote a holiday but a day spent in church praying. The myth of the black-and-white garbed Puritan arose because most people of the time were pictured in black--their Sunday finery--when they had their portraits painted. Black was a very expensive dye in the 1620s and quickly faded to purple, making the garb the most expensive. The easiest dyes, all takeb from vegetables, were red, yellow, and green. The first English settlers actually were a colorful lot who wore multi-hued capes, velvet vests with brass buttons, lace and quilted caps and soft boots [of suede]. . . . Inventories from the period show that church leaders even wore green and red underwear. . . .

    . . . Our Puritan forefathers from England actually were essentially lusty Elizabethans who valued wit and humor and knew how to have fun. A weekly duty for every housewife was the making of beer. Hard cider and a liquor that tasted like brandy were also available. The "Saints" drank alcohol because they considered drinking water to be bad for their health. . . [The "Saints" ate few turkeys, but lots of eels.] Cranberries aren't mentioned in the records at Plimouth until 1650. Probably because it required too much sugar to make the bitter berries tasty. Turkeys became associated with Thanksgiving when Abraham Lincoln made the holiday a national one in 1863. The real treat for the English at the first Thanksgiving was venison. Local Indians, who outnumbered the English 90 to 50, contributed 5 deer to the feast. In England, deer belonged exclusively to royalty and it was against the law for a commoner to eat deer meat. The feast was rounded out by fowl like goose and duck, rabbit, fish, shellfish like clams, and lobster. The tables were also graced with sou ps, meat pies, skillet-fried bread made of corn, dried fruit, and all kinds of wild berries. Researchers claim the English settlers were not too fond of vegetables, but they did eat a lot of squash and pumpkin.

    The celebration included singing, dancing, shooting matches among the English with their heavy, clumbsy muskets, and with the Indians, who showed their marksmanship with arrows. One of the popular games of the day, stool ball, was probably the ancestor of today's cricket and perhaps baseball. One player threw the ball while another used a three-legged stool to hit the ball and run to the equivalent of 17th Century bases. They played tug o' war, and saber tossin' . . .--a log, often the size of a small telephone pole, would be thrown as far as possible. . . .


    Some Puritan Images

     

    Plimouth Colony, 1627


    Path through the gate and village, Plimouth Colony, 1627
    (The Eel River lies in the background)


    Field at the edge of Plimouth Colony


    Saw-pit for cutting logs into planks