Postcolonialism:
(De-)Colonization and Postcolonial Reading/Writing/Social Strategies
The Empire writes back -- by creolizing the language, pluralizing the history, appropriating modes of power to establish the colonized's identity﹐or by physically going back to the metropolitan center . . .
(Undergraduate students, please read Reader's Guide pp. 190; 195-96)
Postcolonial Reading/Writing/Social Strategies
Four Critical Models in the Studies of Postcolonial Literature
cultural syncretism
Postcolonial Reading/Writing/Social Strategies --resistance as subversion, or opposition, or mimicry
- decentring and pluralizing canon, official history and Western hegemony;
-- Double Coding
- Post-Colonial Allegory/Re-Visioning of History: "revising, reappropriating, or reinterpreting history as a concept, and in doing so to articulate new "codes of recognition" within which those acts of resistance, those unrealized intentions and those re-orderings of consciousness that "history" has rendered silent or invisible can be recognized as shaping forces in a culture's tradition." (e.g. China Men, 《高砂百合》, See Post-Colonial Allegory and the Transformation of History)
- Mimicry --"Mimicry is, then, the sign of a double articulation; a complex strategy of reform, regulation and discipline, which 'appropriates' the Other as it visualizes power. Mimicry is also the sign of the inappropriate, however, a difference or recalcitrance which coheres the dominant strategic function of colonial power, intensifies surveillance, and poses an immanent threat to both 'normalized' knowledges and disciplinary powers. "(Bhabha "Of Mimicry and Man" p. 86)
Examples: 1. Self-Images of Chinese-Americans; 2. Self-Images of North American Aboriginals
Negotiation and Cultural Difference
TOP
Four Critical Models in the Studies of Postcolonial Literature
1. 'national' or regional models--which emphasize the distinctive features of the particular national or regional culture
2. race-based models which identify certain shared characteristics across various national literatures
3. comparative models of varying complexity which seek to account for particular linguistic, historical, and cultural features across two or more post-colonial literature
4. more comprehensive comparative models which argue for features such as hybridity and syncreticity as constitutive elements of all post-colonial literatures.
(syncreticism is the process by which previously distinct linguistic categories, and , by extension, cultural formations, merge into a single new form)". (Ashcroft 15 )
TOP
|