Antonio Gramsci
Hegemony, Intellectuals and the State
Provider: Kate Liu /
¼B¬ö¶²
Sources
Position
The State
Intellectuals
Source
I.
His position in Marxist tradition:
-
Developing Marxist view of ideology (after
Marx, Lenin and Lukacs)
-
(Ransom 126-27) From Marx via Lenin
and Lukacs, the concept of ideology partially loses its exclusively
pejorative and negative meaning and becomes instead a
positive concept.
-
With Lenin, the significance of the
struggle within the political sphere between alternative ideologies
becomes a crucial determinant of successful revolutionary practice.
-
With Lukacs, false consciousness which
arises when the proletariat absorbs elements of bourgeois ideology is
recognized as one of the forces which is most likely to jeopardize the
revolution. As a solution to the difficulties thus perceived, Lenin
advocates the need for an intellectual vanguard elite who will bring the
working classes a suitable ideological and political framework within
which to develop the ideas they need in preparing for the crucial moment
of revolution.
-
Re-Discovered by
British New Left: "In Britain, interest in
Gramsci's work coincided with a number of important and interconnected
trends in the Marxist perspective more generally." (Ransom 12 -16 )
1.
a strong interest in the social history of the working class.
2.
the emergence of a strongly 'humanist' and 'culturalist' current
in the writings of Raymond Williams.
3.
critique of "laborism" (an economist perspective that limit the
goal to gaining relatively superficial concessions from the ruling classes);
breaking the 'wretched cultural provincialism" by introducing some theoretical
currents in Europe.
4.
the emergence of Eurocommunist perspective--its need to create
alliances between different groups.
TOP
II. The State: State Society vs. Civil Society; Coercive control and hegemony
(consensual control) (text 218-)
-
school: a positive educative function; the
court, repressive negative educative function (219-20)
-
Hegemony
1. functions:
-
Used as a concept of ideology, the term
hegemony emerges as a way of describing the world-view which any social
group must have if it is to gain power and hold on to it. The development
of coherent and legitimate world-view, in other words, becomes a
prerequisite for successful revolution. (R 128)
-
"A class dominants in two ways, i.e.
'leading' and 'dominant.' It leads the classes which are its allies, and
dominate those which are its enemies. . . . when it is in power it becomes
dominant, but continues to lead as well. . .(text 215)
-
A synthesis of force and consent (text
215; Ransome 26);
-
both economic and political levels: ". . .
though hegemony is ethical-political, it must also be economic, must
necessarily be based on the decisive nucleus of economic activity" (text
216)
-
formation of homogeneity and solidarity:
-
first in the economic-corporate level
(among people of the same job),
-
then among people of the same class, and
-
third, for one to be aware of "one's
corporate interest" "This is the most purely political phase, and marks
the decisive passage from the structure to the sphere of the complex
superstructure; it is the phase in which previously germinated ideologies
become 'party'." (text 216)
1. Organic --
2. the agents of hegemony are conscious and reflective human agents.
3. A form of praxis. A process of conscious intellectual reflection and
synthesis, which leads
-
1. to a greater understanding of material
reality,
-
2. to the development of a new form of
political strategy and action. (R 132-33)
Hegemony = dominant ideology
Historically organic ideology vs. arbitrary ideology (SPN 376-77)
historically organic ideologies
|
arbitrary ideology
|
"those, . . . which are necessary to a given
structure"; "they organize human masses" (SPN 326)
|
arbitrary, rationalistic, or "willed."¡¨
|
. . . They ¡§organize¡¨ human masses, and create the
terrain on which men move, acquire consciousness of their position,
struggle, etc.
arbitrary:
|
they only create individual ¡§movements¡¨, polemics and
so on. (377)
|
TOP
III. Intellectuals
--traditional and organic intellectual
TOP
Sources:
-
TEXT: Gramsci, Antonio. "Hegemony,
Intellectuals and the State." Storey, John, ed. Cultural Theory
and Popular Culture: A Reader. NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994: 215-21.
-
Gramsci, Antonio. Selection from
the Prison Notebooks. Ed. & Trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey
Noewll Smith. NY: International Publisher, 1971.
-
Ransome, Paul. Antonio Gramsci: A
New Introduction. NY: Harvester Wheatseaf, 1992.
TOP